人気ブログランキング | 話題のタグを見る

the most problematic nature of extremist crime is ......

1.Where such extremist crime intends to try to bring govt and ppl to ...
and how govt and ppl to prevent from such confusions in which extremist crime intends to make us fallen into... about between genuine political opinions/activities that should not be cautioned in employments and violence crime/physical insurgent attacks (history) even in the disguise of "political motivated":

It would be subtle issue because sometimes cautions on "political"/"religious" act could damage more general precious freedom of political thoughts and activities that are innate for everyone as part of human rights to be protected.
Such extremest crime seen in Pakistan intentionally, as SUCH EXTREMIST CRIME was originally designed to damage all those freedom and rights that human rights to protect to, might, inevitably, drags govt and ppl down to such subtle difficult choice to avoid employing bodyguard, national guards and policemen who have former violent activities such as firing guns at other bodyguards as the man killed Pakistan governor Salman Tasser had done before.
What most important thing to do is, then, as i already tweet it though, that NOT to be confused between genuine political religious opinion/activities and "political/religious (disguised,motivated)"violence,
most important thing is to differentiate such simple violence
(even in the disguise of political motivated or not)
from cautions on (former) violence / discriminative hate crime commitments in the history of especially bodyguards/policemen/coast guards or military employees.

2.What most problematic and evil of extremist crime:
Extremist crimes have worsen the situation of peace, democracy and human rights via its evilness and in the way whose unthinkable evilness than any other violence.
Extremist crimes kill not only the lives of ppl
but also the life of the human rights that is sheer, sincere precious value that is protecting and underpinning
legitimacy of genuine democracy,
that is freedom of political thoughts and activities
and freedom from any violence, threats, lies, demagogy, and manipulation,
that is protection for all the people and everyone's every minute of his/her daily life.

What is the most problematic nature extremist crime has shown in the world is the evilness in which extremist crime definitely intends, in the first place, certain amount of violent demolishing of the grounds of democracy and human rights while extremist crime itself intentionally disguise violence/killings and/or apparent discrimination against minorities in the disguise of "freedom of speech" AS IF "political" (or "religious") motivated
(AS IF "to do something right") with certain manipulative motif to raise,intentionally,certain prejudice or discriminative violence or act against normal and necessary political opinion/activities underpinning legitimacy of democracy.

The unthinkable tearing-heart tragedy in Arizona where a youth killed 6 people, including 9 yrs old girl who definitely was looking forward to seeing US representative Ms. Gabriella Giffords to talk her opinion about policy, government and community, and shot in head of Ms Gifford, who survived in her amazing courage and strength, at a casual but vital meeting with constituency - that is the one Ms. Giffords always said as the vital occasion to bring mini congress to the corner of the city and streets, the one that President Obama called it as essence of democracy- is also categorized as an extremist crime which is trying to kill and breaking hearts of people believing in love, care and democracy reaching out each other for others - President Obama said in memorial ceremony about what makes people's life important..he said that it is not the amount of payment or position in a company but it is the ways of how to live for others".

No specific clear political message or motif from the suspect is confirmed or particularized by police at the moment, however, it could be also analyzed as one of extremist crime according to the natures of the comments left on the internet sites such as My space and other where the prime suspect arrested at the site of killings have left and also as U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton commented about such potential analysis of the case of the gun violence against Giffords and 6 in Ariz. in HuffPost.
The killings by which intends to damage democracy and human rights in the ways and/or the disguise of "political motivated" which should not be and would not be justified at all.

3.What actual sheer nature of extremist crime:
Extremist crime is not actually political or religious motivated in the bottom line and in its sheer purpose at all.
No matter how extremist crime pretends to be seen as "political/religious motivated",
it is only so in the disguise of "political/religious" motivated
and it is rather one of other violence crime and/or annoyance
in the disguise AS IF it were right things to do
for certain "political/religious motivation"
in order to, actually, discriminate and damage genuine political opinion
and/or peaceful political activities that are vital to protect
life, property, safety, peace, democracy and peaceful co-habit for all.

4.vital alarms are urgent and necessary against
wrongly manipulated praise of such violence crime in the disguise of "political motivated"

People should refrain from being manipulated in the voices of praising such evil violence of extremist crimes which are merely one of another violent killing, attacks and/or discriminative annoyance against minorities, human rights and democracy, in the disguise of "political motivated" in order to justify such simple silly violent crime especially against political figures and other famous figures having political influence on the bills that especially intend to broaden rights of minority and materialize equality of ppl in need.

Objective Purpose/Motivation is not and will not justify violence at all.
And extremist crime is even not "political motivated" rather is disguised in "political motivated" which is nothing more than one of another violent crime which is NOT and will not justified at all, either.

5. Necessary of making laws of stricter banning on gun and cannabis produce/feed/selling/poss/usage:

Ive already tweeted about extremist crime
and some urgently necessary bans on guns, bans on cannabis(marijuana)etc poisonous substances
and bans on violent expressions and violent implications
in political("political?") and election campaigns,
I briefly re-mentioned about crucial bans to be legally passed urgently as follows:

bans on cannabis:As I already hugely wrote in my tweets, besides the case of assassination of Pakistan governor, in the case of Killing at Tuscon Arizona,
the suspect has been reported as the one who has been a cannabis abuser and certain mental illness could be triggered by such cannabis heavy usage.

bans on gun:suspect bought a gun in a shop without any cautions even the suspect has certain crime history of possession of poisonous substances and has arrested once.

bans on violent expressions/speeches/implication in election and/or political campaigns:
In the analysis of the motifs and triggering factors of the killings at Tucson Arizo.,
there is one specific factor has been seen as main influence affects on such murders which is certain violent implication from one certain political group called Tea Party.

It have been said that certain apparent expressions of violence
were existed
at election campaigns
run from those candidates of Tea Party and Tea Party
to the extent which implied assassination
or violence against anti-Tea Party candidates
via the expression of rifle shootings
and the targeting by the rifle gun
which both are definitely inappropriate as "political"campaign ads
or, even any type of campaign ads.

This is NOT the issue of freedom of expression but the issue of appropriateness and coherency which are specially to be required in terms of the purpose of political campaign advertisement which should be at least, truth, fair, peaceful and non-violent in the first place because political candidates must be the people who are definitely peaceful, fair, rational, sincere, non-threating, non-misrepresenting and non-violent.

Laws about setting limitation to ban on violence and violent expression or implication in election\political campaigns when it is visible and/or indirect but apparent in its visibility of violence could be prepared and be passed for everyone who combat extremist crime which uses violence to bend others' opinions or any else.





Check about the following news:
Stricter gun law advocation from Ms.Brady:
http://www.exblog.jp/myblog/entry/edit/?eid=c0156021&srl=15765986
strange law might be passed only to protect congress persons from someone who are close as much as 1000 feet near?
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/01/13/lawmakers-and-the-crazy-l_n_808837.html

about the crime by bodyguard and killer who killed Pakistan governor:
BBC NEWS : http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-south-asia-12184274

about the tragedy of Tucson in Arizona:

Memorial Ceremony at Tucson, University of Arizona State
by NewsHour
FULL VIDEO of Tucson Memorial Service http://ow.ly/3CWMw

by NewsHour (Great Recovery of Ms.Giffords)
Rep. Wasserman-Schultz on Giffords' Condition, Power of Friendship http://ow.ly/3DCl2

Ms.Clinton's comments on extremist crime which have seen universal scale and her strong will to combat to stop extremist crimes in the world and any areas...
(WLBT)(AP) http://www.wlbt.com/Global/story.asp?S=13813123
(politico)http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0111/47356.html

Victims in the killing at Tuson Arizona
9 yr old girl (AP) http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/U/US_CONGRESSWOMAN_SHOT?SITE=AZTUC&SECTION=HOME&TEMPLATE=DEFAULT&CTIME=2011-01-14-05-47-58

about tuscon killings and urges of law making about ban on arms in usa:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/01/13/obama-gun-control-gibbs_n_808535.html
by 7thclouds | 2011-01-14 21:31 | 雑感